What is Phonological Typology?

نویسنده

  • Larry M. Hyman
چکیده

In this talk I am concerned with the following questions: 1. What is phonological typology? 2. How are phonological typology and phonetic typology the same/different? 3. How are phonological typology and general phonology the same/different? 4. How are phonological typology and general typology the same/different? Despite earlier work by Trubetzkoy, Jakobson, Martinet, Greenberg and others, and its inclusion in even earlier efforts towards “holistic” typology (see Plank 1998), phonological typology is often underrepresented or even excluded in typology textbooks (see Hyman 2007). At the same time, many, if not most phonologists do not see a difference between phonological typology and cross-linguistic (formal and descriptive) phonology. As a result, they often address issues of comparison without awareness of the field of typology and its concern with distributions, e.g. Bickel’s (2007) “What, where, why?” and with little involvement in the foundational and methodological questions or controversies peppering the pages of Linguistic Typology, e.g. whether pre-established categories exist (Haspelmath 2007 vs. Newmeyer 2007). To address the above (and other) questions, Frans Plank, Aditi Lahiri and I co-organized the following workshop in Oxford on August 11-13, 2013: http://www.ling-phil.ox.ac.uk/files/research/Phon-Typ-Schedule.pdf In this talk, presented first at Oxford, I provide a number of reasons why (phonological) typology should not be about assigning languages to “types”, nor can it be limited to examinging the sameness vs. differences of surface inventories. Instead, like phonology in general, the attention of phonological typology must be on STRUCTURE, i.e. with input-output relations between the different levels and domains required to account for phonological properties across languages. PS This talk will also give people an idea of some of what we will discuss in my Linguistics 211b/290e. Cited references: Bickel, Balthasar. 2007. Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11.239-251. Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11.119-132. Hyman, Larry M. 2007. Where’s phonology in typology? Linguistic Typology 11.265-271. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2007. Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology 11.133-158. Plank, Frans. 1998. The co-variation of phonology with morphology and syntax: A hopeful history. Linguistic Typology 2.195-230.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Post-Nasal Devoicing and a Probabilistic Model of Phonological Typology

This paper addresses one of the most contested issues in phonology: the derivation of phonological typology. I argue that the unnatural process of postnasal devoicing does not derive from a single unnatural sound change, but rather from a combination of two or three sounds changes, each of which is natural and well-motivated. Evidence from both historical and dialectal data is brought to bear t...

متن کامل

Probabilistic Typology: Deep Generative Models of Vowel Inventories

Linguistic typology studies the range of structures present in human language. The main goal of the field is to discover which sets of possible phenomena are universal, and which are merely frequent. For example, all languages have vowels, while most—but not all—languages have an [u] sound. In this paper we present the first probabilistic treatment of a basic question in phonological typology: ...

متن کامل

From phonological typology to the development of receptive and productive phonological competence: Applications of minimal violation

at the Utrecht phonology workshop on typology and acquisition, also helped crystallize my thoughts on the topic.

متن کامل

What is Reduplication? Typology and Analysis Part 1/2: The Typology of Reduplication

Reduplication has played a central role in the development of phonological theories for 30years. The introduction of Classical Optimality Theory (OT) in the 1990s sparked intensive research into the typology and analysis of reduplicative patterns, as reduplication was a key testing area both for OT and for theories critical of OT. Now, after some 20years of research within the OT model, it is a...

متن کامل

Lexical and Non-lexical Tone and Prosodic Typology

Prosodic typology has generally concentrated on those aspects of prosodic representation which are assumed to be represented in the lexicon. It is argued here that non-lexical representation at various levels, underlying phonological, surface phonological and phonetic, can also constitute a basis for prosodic typology. An example is given of a low-level comparison of English and French pitch pa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013